The conversation centers on a stubborn truth: most boards are well briefed on emerging risks, yet few translate insight into movement. The research shows 76 percent receive comprehensive risk reports, 42 percent engage meaningfully, and just 22 percent act. That collapse at the decision point is the “funnel of inaction.” The hosts argue that leaders chase the wrong fix by investing in problem precision using hyper-detailed probabilities and impact ranges. This approach only provides a marginal, statistically insignificant uplift in action. Precision invites skepticism, shifts attention to model assumptions, and implies costly, multi-year programs that boards rationally defer. The better path is to reframe conversations around solution options that emphasize low regret actions, the cost of delay, adjustments to existing programs, and clear pacing across quarters.