Audit Committees Signal a Mandate for Unified IRM, Not Just GRC

Audit committees in 2025 are under growing pressure to oversee risks that are more complex, interconnected, and fast-moving than ever before. KPMG’s survey of 85 U.S. audit committee members (February–May 2025) highlights systemic oversight gaps in cybersecurity, privacy, AI, and third-party resilience. While only one-quarter of respondents describe their risk management as holistic and forward looking, the survey reveals that committees are struggling less with awareness and more with execution. The IRM Navigator™ Maturity Curve confirms that most organizations remain in the early to mid stages of maturity. However, the five functional layers of Autonomous IRM offer a more practical blueprint for closing these oversight gaps and absorbing workload without restructuring committees.

This research note interprets the KPMG findings through the lens of both frameworks: the Maturity Curve, which shows where audit committees are today, and the five functional layers, which define how they can progress toward unified, assurance-driven oversight.

Ori Wellington

Orion “Ori” Wellington is the lead editor for The RiskTech Journal and The RTJ Bridge, where he helps shape editorial direction, guide strategic narratives, and support media relations across Wheelhouse Advisors. As a digital editorial advisor, Ori synthesizes trends in risk, technology, and governance, drawing from roles modeled on information security, risk analytics, and IT leadership.

Part of Wheelhouse’s AI-augmented research team, Ori works to distill complex signals into actionable intelligence—bridging expertise across domains and elevating the voice of integrated risk thinking.

https://wheelhouseadvisors.com
Sign up to read this post
Join Now
Previous
Previous

Technology Risk at Machine Speed: Why Integrated Systems Demand Integrated Risk Management

Next
Next

Agentic AI in Risk Management Consulting: A Field Report on the Road to Autonomous IRM