Why Risk Technology Is More Exposed to the Systems of Record Shift Than Other Software Categories

Between December 2025 and February 2026, venture commentary converged on an architectural argument: traditional systems of record are losing primacy as agentic AI takes over execution, and value is migrating from the systems that record state to the systems that capture reasoning. Sarah Wang at Andreessen Horowitz, Jamin Ball at Clouded Judgement, and Jaya Gupta and Ashu Garg at Foundation Capital each made a version of the case in pieces published within two weeks of one another.

The venture commentary drew its examples from sales, support, and finance. Those domains can tolerate lossy decision capture. Risk technology cannot. Audit, compliance, and assurance are not optional use cases bolted onto risk platforms. They are the reason the platforms exist, and each of them requires the ability to answer why something was allowed to happen.

The IRM50 AI Disruption Risk Index measures vendor-level exposure across fifty IRM and GRC platforms. The gap between tier one and tier five is not incremental. It is the difference between absorbing the shift and being absorbed by it.

John A. Wheeler

John A. Wheeler is the founder and CEO of Wheelhouse Advisors, a global risk management strategy and technology advisory firm. With over three decades of experience spanning executive management, finance, risk management, audit, and IT, John is a world-renowned expert in integrated risk management technology, executive leadership, and corporate governance.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnawheeler/
Sign up to read this post
Join Now
Next
Next

What Risk Leaders Need to Know About AI Infrastructure